Candy? Or Not? Check the list.

May 17, 2010 at 8:30 am 4 comments

Washington State Candy Tax Update:

The candy sales tax goes into effect June 1, and officials at the Washington State Department of Revenue have been working to compile a list. All the candy, and all the candy like substances that are not candy.

Here’s the definition Washington State is using, with that funny flour exemption:

What is candy?
Candy is a preparation of sugar, honey, or other natural or artificial sweeteners combined with chocolate, fruits, nuts, or other ingredients or flavorings and formed into bars, drops, or pieces. Candy does not require refrigeration. Candy does not include any preparation containing flour.

Flour is made from grain such as wheat, rice, corn, rye, oats, and barley.  Flour does not include flour substitutes, such as starch. Any product that lists flour as an ingredient on the nutritional facts label is not taxable as candy.

You can read more about the definition and its irrational craziness in my post Defining Candy: The Candy Tax.

But if you’d like to check to see whether your favorite candy is actually candy, or some  tax-free candy like substance, check out the spreadsheet at: http://www.dor.wa.gov/Content/FindALawOrRule/NewLegislation/Important.aspx click on “June 1 Candy and gum sales tax exemption repealed” then go to “List of candy products and products similar to candy.” In a particularly helpful gesture, the News Tribune (Tacoma) has created a nifty little search box so you can input your favorite treats and find out where they fall along the candy/no candy line.

So far, the list includes something like 3,500 different candies in the state, and they had to check the ingredients of each and every one. More to come, though: the Revenue office just received a new distributor’s list of Asian candies sold in the state. 11,000 kinds.

We knew about a few of the clinkers: Kit Kats, Twix, M&M Pretzel, and licorice will not henceforth be known as candy in Washington State. But Milky Way bars? Never saw it coming.

The flour exemption was meant to carve out an exception for cookies. So now when you buy a 100  Grand Bar or a Look Bars, hey, it’ s not a candy bar at all!

For a great story about the man behind the candy list, Patrick Gillespie, see Nicole Brodeur, Candy Man’s job can be taxing” in the Seattle Times.

Entry filed under: Current Candy News, Economy. Tags: , , .

No Gum For You! News Brief: Eat Wilbur Buds, Live Forever

4 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Countdown to Candy Tax: 8 Days « Candy Professor  |  May 24, 2010 at 7:52 am

    [...] Candy? Or Not? Check the List. Links to Washington  State’s official list of taxable and exempt candies. [...]

    Reply
  • 2. The End of Candy « Candy Professor  |  May 24, 2010 at 11:40 am

    [...] And clearly, there is a lot of candy that doesn’t want to be seen as candy. If you wander over to the snack aisle, you might find items like “Welch’s Fruit Snacks,” or Betty Crocker’s “Fruit by the Foot.” Fruit, right? Um, not exactly. Because whether the sugar comes from apple juice or pear puree or sugar cane crystals, it’s still sugar. But since these products look like something from fruit, they are somehow exempt from the stigma associated with candy. Just ask the Washington State Tax authorities who didn’t even consider those “fruit snacks” when they put together the list for the new candy tax. [...]

    Reply
    • 3. Wil Ran  |  April 25, 2013 at 12:35 am

      Is there any list that specifically says which candy bars are no longer candy? The links in this article no longer work. Thank you.

      Reply
      • 4. Candy Professor  |  May 9, 2013 at 3:00 pm

        Sorry to hear the links don’t work. I guess the tax people gave up on that project. Basically anything that has flour, so that would be all the bars that have cookies or wafers in them.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Candy: A Century of Panic and Pleasure

Welcome to Candy Professor

Candy in American Culture What is it about candy? Here you'll find the forgotten, the strange, the curious, the surprising. Our candy story, one post at a time.

Samira Kawash, PhD
Professor Emerita,
Rutgers University

(C) Samira Kawash

All written contents protected by copyright. Except where noted, Candy Professor is my original research, based on archives, journals, magazines, newspapers, and other historical artifacts. You do not have permission to copy or re-post my content. If you want to refer to my work, please create a link from the blog entry and also write out the citation:
Samira Kawash, "entry name," candyprofessor.com, entry date.

If you would like to copy, re-post, or reproduce my work, please contact me for permission.

Categories

Enter your address to receive notifications by email.

Join 569 other followers

Header Image Credit


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 569 other followers