The End of Candy

May 24, 2010 at 11:38 am 7 comments

2009 was the final year for the “All Candy Expo,” the National Confectioner’s Association’s major trade show. For 2010, the event has been renamed: “Sweets and Snacks Expo.” It’s happening this week in Chicago. I wish I were there. Katharine Weber has a great scene in her novel True Confections based on the Expo, and she makes it seem like a lot of fun (and if you’re there this week, look for Katharine, she’s at the Expo signing copies of her book).

But I’m a little sad about the renaming of the event. Candy doesn’t even merit mention in the event name. The event will feature:

“Confectionery. Chocolate. Candy. Gum. Salty Snacks. Cookies. Popcorn. Biscuits. Breakfast Snacks. Nutrition Bars. Meat Snacks. Fruit Snacks. Granola Bars. Nuts.”

Candy is still up front, but the line of alternatives seems long and decidedly un-candy-like.

A lot of what used to be called candy is now re-imagined as “snacks” (which I guess sounds more like food and therefore more respectable). Meanwhile, candy like everything else these days is trending “healthy.” Which may be about things that are better for you, or it may just be about things that seem better for you. We’re seeing a lot of pseudo-candy on the grocery store shelves: foods that are candy-like, but that promise some other virtue. Fruit juice, all natural, organic, vitamin fortified, and the like. Candy can’t just be candy.

And clearly, there is a lot of candy that doesn’t want to be seen as candy. If you wander over to the snack aisle, you might find items like “Welch’s Fruit Snacks,” or Betty Crocker’s “Fruit by the Foot.” Fruit, right? Um, not exactly. Because whether the sugar comes from apple juice or pear puree or sugar cane crystals, it’s still sugar. But since these products look like something from fruit, they are somehow exempt from the stigma associated with candy. Just ask the Washington State Tax authorities who didn’t even consider those “fruit snacks” when they put together the list for the new candy tax.

The rise of candy taxes in Washington, Colorado, Illinois, and the murmurings heard elsewhere, tell us which way the wind is blowing on candy. American’s will still want it, and still eat it. But it won’t be called candy. And it will likely be manufactured and packaged in some way to evade legal definitions on candy. Even today, products like Milky Way candy bars and Look candy bars are exempt from the Washington tax because they contain flour. So just add a pinch of flour to your recipe, and presto, your candy is tranformed into tax-free food.

As far as the tax goes, I really don’t care. But I do think there is something important about honesty and transparency and clarity in what we eat and how we choose.

Candy is a lovely thing. How sad it would be to hide it, to distort it, to smother it because we can’t call a thing by its name.

Entry filed under: Current Candy News, Marketing.

Countdown to Candy Tax The Beginning of Candy

7 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Katharine Weber  |  May 24, 2010 at 7:31 pm

    But even when it was All Candy, there was a “meat snack aisle” and lots of chips and nut products. So the snacky aspect has been present for a while. At last year’s show, the Kraft Vice President for Immediate Consumption (I adore her job title and keep her card in my wallet just so I can look at it from time to time) gave a talk on “snack opportunities.” The great news for the snack industry, she told us, is that the average American now eats four meals a day. I agree that the emphasis on candy as a food and a reasonable snack option is part of this nomenclature shift.

    I am looking forward to the show, whatever it’s called!

    • 2. Candy Professor  |  May 24, 2010 at 7:43 pm

      Wait…meat snacks at all candy? Be still my heart. Send a missive if you can, we’d love a guest post from the candy trenches!

  • 3. Katharine Weber  |  May 24, 2010 at 9:49 pm

    The meat snacks (turkey jerky, for example) are always a very good way to get that glycemic level under control after a few too many samples in the gummy aisle.

    On Wednesday I am going to be phoning in a report on the show to Connecticut Public Radio’s Faith Middleton Show/The Food Schmooze. This will be listenable to and podcast at that afternoon at 3 eastern time, I think.

    • 4. Candy Professor  |  May 24, 2010 at 10:12 pm

      Gummies…turkey…gummies….turkey… I think I get it. I’ll be listening!

  • 5. Katharine Weber  |  May 25, 2010 at 8:50 pm

    So after Day One I can say that the snacky things I agreed to put in my mouth were mostly very unnecessary. Like for example Perky Jerky, a caffeinated beef jerky product. And there is endless brand extending going on in the world of candy at a really extreme rate. And everything seems to have a new mango or pomegranate flavor option. And pretzel M&Ms are cashing in on the very popular savory and salty plus sweet category. And the new pellety Hershey drops are like flattened, miniaturized Hershey’s Kisses, but with a hard shell chocolate candy coating so they don’t melt….sound familiar? And speaking of M&Ms, Mars are reintroducing orange.

    • 6. Candy Professor  |  May 25, 2010 at 9:26 pm

      I can’t believe I’m missing this. And about the Perky Jerkey…I’m so sorry! I hope it doesn’t keep you up tonight, you have a big day tomorrow! Sweet dreams…

  • […] was wrong when I said it was the end of candy. It’s just the beginning. Candy has never been like […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed

Candy: A Century of Panic and Pleasure

Welcome to Candy Professor

Candy in American Culture What is it about candy? Here you'll find the forgotten, the strange, the curious, the surprising. Our candy story, one post at a time.

(C) Samira Kawash

All written contents protected by copyright. Except where noted, Candy Professor is my original research, based on archives, journals, magazines, newspapers, and other historical artifacts. You do not have permission to copy or re-post my content. If you want to refer to my work, please create a link from the blog entry and also write out the citation:
Samira Kawash, "entry name,", entry date.

If you would like to copy, re-post, or reproduce my work, please contact me for permission.


Header Image Credit